secretasshole: (I feel fantastic and I'm still alive)
David 8 ([personal profile] secretasshole) wrote2013-05-12 07:30 pm

011 웃 VIDEO

[David's about six months into his stay on the Barge and he's... frankly unimpressed. And a little bored. And a little annoyed with certain developments, so long as we're being totally honest, and after having a while to sit on it and think over the issue, he's turning on his communicator.]

In the past few months, two wardens have been demoted, [And both of them wardened people with his face, which is. Just weird. But there have been stranger freak coincidences in their lives, so.] and I've found myself wondering: why is it that inmates are subjected to such heavy questioning and scrutiny when they first arrive, and afterward, while wardens are almost automatically afforded a certain amount of trust by their peers?

Obviously, for the most part, it would seem that that trust hasn't been misplaced, but two demotions is still less than reassuring. Why should one put trust in any warden when they, too, have the potential to become an inmate?

I'm simply curious.

[Maybe.]
supersonic: (pic#)

[personal profile] supersonic 2013-05-13 04:31 am (UTC)(link)
As much as, on principle, I hate to agree with anyone with your face... [ A shrug. Look, you can finish the rest of that sentence. Also hi, apparently Pietro has decided to stop avoiding you and will now act like this is the most natural thing in the world, zero fucks given. ]

However, to be frank, I would not put my trust in anyone here unearned, warden or not. The only reason they get to interrogate us and not vice versa is simply because they are in power.